Site Wide Tools Nav  
Students SiteFuture Student's SiteDistance SiteFaculty and Staff Site
UAS Home Page Contacts A-Z Site Index

 

 

A Voice for Students
An Opportunity for Students

Volume 24, Issue 7-December 13, 2002
Whalesong Masthead

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

 INSIDE: Be a mentor!                       Recognizing eating disorders
         Study in London this spring             Navigating online deals
 


Carter accepts Nobel Peace Prize, warns against use of war
  MIAMI - Accepting the Nobel Peace Prize on Tuesday, former President Jimmy Carter rejected the concept of “preventive war” but called on Iraq to comply fully with a U.N. resolution designed to head off a war over weapons of mass destruction.
  “War may sometimes be a necessary evil”' the 39th American president declared, “but no matter how necessary, it is always an evil- never a good. We will not learn how to live together in peace by killing each other's children.”
  The 78-year-old former chief executive diplomatically avoided explicit criticism of the Bush administration, which has said war in Iraq may be necessary to forestall a larger conflict, but he rejected the principle out of hand.
  “For powerful countries to adopt a principle of preventive war may well set an example that can have catastrophic consequences,” the president told the Oslo City Hall audience of about 1,000 people that included his wife Rosalynn and their children, as well as Norway's King Harald and Queen Sonja.
  Moreover, without specifically mentioning Baghdad or Saddam Hussein, he criticized President Bush's threat to attack Iraq without U.N. support if the White House deems it necessary.
  “It is clear that global challenges must be met with an emphasis on peace, in harmony with others, with strong alliances and international consensus,” Carter said. “Imperfect as it may be, there is no doubt that this can best be done through the United Nations.”
  Later, in the same speech, he urged Iraq to “comply fully” with U.N. Security Council resolutions demanding that Baghdad rid itself of weapons of mass destruction. “The world insists that it must be done,” he said.
  The pomp and solemnity of the gold medal award, accompanied by a $1 million cash prize, gave Carter a prestigious podium from which to revive a variety of familiar themes involving the search for peace and promotion of human rights, the issues that were the hallmark of his presidency.
  He criticized economic embargoes and urged Israel to leave the West Bank and Gaza Strip if it wants to achieve peace.
  A former peanut farmer and Navy submarine officer, the Georgia Democrat was elected president in 1976 but lost his bid for a second term to Ronald Reagan, the Republican, in 1980.
  In retirement he has run the Carter Center in Atlanta, using it as a launch pad to travel throughout Latin America, often as an elections monitor; mediate international crises, mostly on a freelance basis; and champion anti-poverty programs.
  As president, he ceded U.S. control of the Panama Canal, a move conservatives called a strategic blunder. When the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan in 1979, his administration armed anti-communist Muslims. A Saudi on the Islamic side was named Osama bin Laden.
As a private citizen, Carter mediated the end of a military coup in Haiti in 1994 to reinstate President Jean-Bertrand Aristide, and ostensibly stabilize that still-troubled Caribbean nation.
  Two years later he careened between West Bank polling places to monitor the first -and so far only -Palestinian Authority elections.
  “Not all his efforts have been equally successful,” said Nobel Committee head Gunnar Berge, awarding the prize. “But, as Carter himself has said . . . ‘The worst thing that you can do is not to try.’ Few people, if any, have tried harder.”
  He said Carter “does the opposite of what his countryman Mark Twain once wrote about forgetting where you bury the peace-pipe, but not where the battle-axe is. Carter never mislays the peace-pipe.''
  Long an opponent of the U.S. economic embargo of Cuba, Carter included his criticisms in the 2,300-word Nobel address, without specifically naming Fidel Castro or Havana.
  “We must also strive to correct the injustice of economic sanctions that seek to penalize abusive leaders but all too often inflict punishment on those who are already suffering from the abuse,” he said.

Back to issue contents / Homepage

UAS is an AA/EO institution. Copyright 2005
text-only page produced automatically by LIFT Text Transcoder
Contact Us